Click for Westport Click for Nordhavn Click for Glendinning Click for Mag Bay Click for Delta

Griffin vs. Racor

Discussion in 'Technical Discussion' started by Jimbo1959, Jun 13, 2012.

You need to be registered and signed in to view this content.
  1. Jimbo1959

    Jimbo1959 Member

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2010
    Messages:
    77
    Location:
    Stockton, CA
    Just recently ran across a turbine type fuel water/separator filter manufactured by Griffin. Has anyone used these filters? How do they compare to Racor separator?
  2. RT46

    RT46 Senior Member

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2011
    Messages:
    1,058
    Location:
    Long Island, NY
    i have seen them on ebay and I am also interested in them because they seem to be extremely similar and take the same element only the purchase price is cheaper.

    I do not know anyone who uses Griffins.
  3. Capt J

    Capt J Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2005
    Messages:
    14,432
    Location:
    Fort Lauderdale
    Just go with a Racor, it's a proven design that you never have issues with. I've found that you always get what you pay for. You buy a cheaper product and you have nothing but problems......
  4. Marmot

    Marmot Senior Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2007
    Messages:
    3,311
    Location:
    9114 S. Central Ave
    Have you ever done a refit?
  5. rgsuspsa

    rgsuspsa Member

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2009
    Messages:
    87
    Location:
    Melbourne, FL
    Racor vs Griffin filters

    Griffin filters are Chinese made replicas of Racor filters. As to manufacturing
    merits of the Griffins, I do not have first hand knowledge.
  6. K1W1

    K1W1 Senior Member

    Joined:
    Sep 30, 2005
    Messages:
    7,388
    Location:
    My Office
    Hi,

    I do not have any experience with them nor do I know anyone that has.

    I have looked all over the net and do not find any negative comments on blogs/forums in reply to my searches.

    I use a dual Racor 500FG on my gensets and change one filter every 10 days so I might try a box of these fellas and see if they last as long, keep the secondaries clean as long.
  7. Capt J

    Capt J Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2005
    Messages:
    14,432
    Location:
    Fort Lauderdale
    Yes, and when it comes to parts, you generally always get what you pay for. Same for fixing/repairing/rebuilding many junk parts during a refit. Many times the repair costs exceed the new cost of a part *not always*.

    As for Chinese copies of a Racor, NO THANKS. Racor's are cheap enough that there is no need to buy chinese copies.
  8. captholli

    captholli Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2010
    Messages:
    1,164
    Location:
    In The Bilge
    Odd question Bill, where are you going with this inquiry?
  9. Marmot

    Marmot Senior Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2007
    Messages:
    3,311
    Location:
    9114 S. Central Ave
    It was a sarcastic reference to the fact that only infrequently in yachting does one get what one pays for, or thinks one is paying for.

    As far as a new entry to the market, sometimes a new guy can produce an equal or better product for the same or even lower price than the old tried and true item that may or may not match the quality standard it has come to represent.

    Chinese knockoff? Guess where Racor filters and housings are manufactured.

    If we refused to try the offerings of different manufacturers we would still be using tube type radars manufactured by American defense contractors on a production line built in 1943.
  10. Capt J

    Capt J Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2005
    Messages:
    14,432
    Location:
    Fort Lauderdale
    UMMMMM were'nt Dahl's and Separ's designed to be an improvement over Racors when they first were introduced? Dahl's were actually designed by the guy who origionally designed the Racor's. A direct copy of a Racor is nothing different, revelutionary, or changing anything.

    It's like these blasted Algae-X's that Sunseeker thought was a **** good idea instead of installing Racor's or any other primary and relies on just the Man Common Rail primary's and secondaries, yet every MAN dealer and even MAN of North America's head engineer told me, they really SHOULD have racor's in front of them. Yet there is NO space in the engine room to mount Racor's. The Algae-X's macerate the algae so that the primary 10 micron filters stay crystal clean and the secondary filters (2 micron)which are twice as expensive and twice as hard to change, get plastered with Algae.......
  11. dennismc

    dennismc Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2009
    Messages:
    1,174
    Location:
    Vancouver BC
    My neighbours 65 azimut with Mans has racors in front off to one side, no problem
  12. captholli

    captholli Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2010
    Messages:
    1,164
    Location:
    In The Bilge
    Personally I would love to see some company give Parker Hannifin (Racor) a run for their money competition wise with a good centrifugal / coalessor type of fuel filtration system as its a huge $$$ market / Kind of surprised that Alfa Laval hasnt jumped into the Static filtration market because they have the lock on centrifugal filtration from everything from Fuel, Ballast water, Milk and dairy etc, etc, I find that while Racor's do a good job their price point might be better if they had some serious competition.
  13. K1W1

    K1W1 Senior Member

    Joined:
    Sep 30, 2005
    Messages:
    7,388
    Location:
    My Office
  14. captholli

    captholli Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2010
    Messages:
    1,164
    Location:
    In The Bilge
    Good point K1W1,
    I've had a couple of Westfalia units onboard over the years but found them to be odd machines compared to the Laval units as far as cleaning and P.M. was concerned, I guess that I was weened on lavals and couldnt come to grips/love with the new animal. Funny that this technology apparently derived from the dairy sector as you and I both mentioned. It seems that now the big market $$$ is going to be ballast water purification as outlined by the IMO guidlines. Ohh, to just have a crystal ball that worked better!!
    Who would have thought ballast water would've been an issue 20 years ago? or for that matter the new push for vessels in port to "Cold Iron" and shut down their Gens. for cleaner air around urban centers?? Times are a changing for sure.
  15. Capt J

    Capt J Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2005
    Messages:
    14,432
    Location:
    Fort Lauderdale
    I disagree. The fuel filter housings/assemblies last darn near the life of the boat and most of the time you don't even have to fix anything on them. They're not un-reasonable IMO........

    The turbine filter elements on the other hand are by FAR the cheapest compared to the competitions filter housings such as Separ, Dahl, and most other's.
  16. travler

    travler Senior Member

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2008
    Messages:
    276
    Location:
    roche harbor wa
    i have a westfalia centrafuge that has been on the boat since 1972 i finaly rebuilt it last year, i usualy change the fuel filters once a year just because it needs to be claened about every ten days are so and change the oil at the same time

    just some thoughts travler
  17. K1W1

    K1W1 Senior Member

    Joined:
    Sep 30, 2005
    Messages:
    7,388
    Location:
    My Office
    Hi,

    If your centrifuge really needs to be cleaned you need to check what you are loading as Fuel and also check what Gravity Disc you have in it.

    I am running an Alfa Laval MAB 104 now 24/7 and we clean it once a month or more if the output hasn't dropped from 2.2 Bar ( 32 psi) to 1.0 bar ( 15 psi, the clean point).

    Are you sure you do not have some serious growth in your fuel?
  18. travler

    travler Senior Member

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2008
    Messages:
    276
    Location:
    roche harbor wa
    the fuel we get is not allways a good quality i do it mosty as a precaution if i know we are getting good fuel i will wait longer , thanks for the coments

    travler
  19. Yachtjocky

    Yachtjocky Senior Member

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2010
    Messages:
    365
    Location:
    Fort Lauderdale
    Purifiers

    I started with Laval purifiers but then Westfallia came along with much better units (40 years ago) for the very bad heavy fuel oils we were expected to use in our big old slow speed diesels found on the ships.

    Over time though we found that the Westfalia units were the best for the heavy fuel and Laval units best for lube oil.

    As for cleaning some of the fuel we had onboard seemed to come out of the ground and straight into our tanks. Try a maximum of 4 hours before having to change over to the back up unit and then it would take for hours to strip and clean those big old units, using liquid nitrogen to freeze the lock ring and then chiseling out the carbon before the other one shut down.

    The good old days and that was all done in 110 to 140 degree rooms dedicated to treating the fuel.

    As for ballast water my other company has been involved with that for years, using filters, centrifuges, electro coagulators, zebro mussels brought everything to the fore and it has taken years for any real laws to be brought in so we switched to treating sewage water on the cruise ships, waste water from cattle grow pens and treating water inlets into Mexican bakeries.

    Our ballast treatment has a great side effect in that the water going through plate coolers can be treated and the cleaning cycles of those units can be extended two or even three times longer.

    Some of the ships now have absolute zero discharge of anything, compare that to all of the little yachts going around with bilge pump direct overboards, add all of that up from drips and leaks of oil and diesel and AC condensation and you may find your little 30 foot sail boat discharges more than the largest Carnival ship.
  20. Marmot

    Marmot Senior Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2007
    Messages:
    3,311
    Location:
    9114 S. Central Ave
    We even collected the rainwater off the deck on tankers.