Click for Mulder Click for Nordhavn Click for Mulder Click for Abeking Click for Burger

sandwich vs single skin hulls

Discussion in 'Technical Discussion' started by RNB, Jan 12, 2007.

You need to be registered and signed in to view this content.
  1. RNB

    RNB New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2006
    Messages:
    7
    Location:
    Sydney, AUS
    From the research I've done there seems to be a compelling case for cored hulls for sailing yachts in terms of the advantages of lower weight, improved stiffness and impact strength, thermal and acoustic insulation. But there remains significant differences in build techniques between different yards. For sail boats of 20 to 25 meters it does not even seem to be an issue of cost. Swan for example build (mainly) single skin hulls as do Oyster. Baltic, HR, and many other yards swear by cored hulls. There is a parallel discussion here about resin infusion, and other build methods but what is the view as to why we dont see more cored hulls with the overall performance advantages they offer?
  2. AMG

    AMG YF Moderator

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2004
    Messages:
    5,375
    Location:
    Sweden
    Hi RNB and welcome to YachtForums!

    When you say performance, it can be several things, but for trawlers and long range sailing boats a solid GRP can give a smoother ride without slamming and also extra strength if you collide with a hard object. But for yachts where you want less hull weight, the infusion with a core material is to prefer. (Swan has it on the new 42 New York Yacht Club racer).

    Sound insulation may be improved on slowgoing boats, but on high speed boats (35-45 knots cruising) we experience almost the opposite. A light cored construction is creating more noise from the sea than a solid more heavy. We now have to add dampening material and weight inside the vacuum cored hull...

    To build with infusion is more time consuming (and expensive) but gives a better working environment, why I think more builders will end up doing it.
  3. RNB

    RNB New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2006
    Messages:
    7
    Location:
    Sydney, AUS
    cored vs single skin hulls

    Thanks for your comments. I have been researching a good deal on this subject with a view to having a 22 - 25 metre performance cruising boat built. I keep thinking I am quite well informed until I learn something new -which is often! This area of materials technology in boat building is changing and clearly relatively complex. I may have been seduced by research I have seen on stiffness, rigidity, and impact strength shown to me during a meeting with SP Systems (now Gurit) which I have to say was compelling (esp the carbon/kevlar, e-glass, corecell epoxy sandwich - which admittedly is a v. high quality solution). But it also seems to me there are "religious" views about cored vs single skin hulls as it is difficult to get a consistency of view from either naval architects and boat builders. There are builders who have stated to me they will never, ever build a cored hull (incl one well known brand in the UK). I know it is only quite recently that core materials have become available in forms and shapes which make it simpler/more practical to include in the lamination or infusion process, producing no resin voids and good bonding between core and skin. Also the fact that the price of carbon and kevlar is coming down, and computer aided design and plug development is bringing economies and a degree of accuracy in build processes not seen before (which has allowed Shipman to produce their 50 and 63 ft performance cruisers for example). So I try to keep an open mind on the subject. Its interesting to note that all the RNLI boats built by Green Marine in the UK have been built with cored hulls for the last several years - and you cannot get a more demanding build spec than life boats. There are of course those who believe I should build in alustar or other marine grade aluminium alloy - but thats another debate! What I want is a conclusive scientific answer but of course as with most things to do with designing and building sail boats, it ends up being a compromise between competing forces - principally use and purpose, cost and design. We continue exploring! Best. RNB
  4. AMG

    AMG YF Moderator

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2004
    Messages:
    5,375
    Location:
    Sweden
    If you are planning a performance sailer, you probably mean faster than a cruiser and perhaps mainly sailing in daylight, which points towards a composite hull, like the boats from Green Marine. When it comes to strength, there are different things you like to achieve, torsion or structural strength where cored hulls are superior. Also impact strength from the elements, but impacts from hard and sharp objects is a weaker point. The outer skin is much thinner on boats built with core and infusion and once you crack it open, it is almost like opening a can. Nothing you would like to experience on a night crossing with a small crew. Or ever...

    Maybe Alustar is a good compromise of weight saving and impact strength after all...:)
  5. ESYD

    ESYD Member Removed

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2004
    Messages:
    17
    Location:
    St. Augustine, FL
    If it were my boat and I wanted composite construction, I would go cored. I am also assuming that this is a one-off, not a production boat. The differences in building in a female mold for production are significantly different than the process of building a one-off over a male framework.

    My favorite core for this application is Core-Cell, an SAN foam that comes in different densities and cuts, including strip-planking. The core is strip-planked and glued together, and the outside skin is laid up. Impregnators to get the resin/fiber ratio right, and vacuum bagging provides very good laminate characteristics. After removing the hull with core and outside skin from the framework, the inside skin is laid up. Therefore, you elimate the core bonding layer which eliminates any risk in a poor core-to-skin bond. In production female tooling, it is essential that the core be bonded to the outside skin with either an infusion process or into Core-Bond under vacuum.

    Any builder who knows what he is doing can build you an appropriately strong and stiff hull, be it solid or cored. Whatever weight difference there may be are taken account of the the design process. There is no secret here, it is just a matter of keeping weights and centers under control as one would do in any normal design process. There is no reason why a cored hull can't be built robustly that will last for ages. Choice of materials and skill in the processes consistent with those materials are what are key.

    One of my favorite designs that I happened to see built was the 50' round-the-world sailing yacht Airco Distributor, designed by Rodger Martin for Mike Plant who built it himself. The hull was built in Newport, RI, in 1984-85 with Airex cored fiberglass and Dow Derakane 8084 vinylester resin. This yacht has been around the world three times in the Around Alone Race (formerly the BOC) and has crossed the Atlantic 15 times. It still competes from time to time. This is a great testament to longevity in cored construction.

    In my current design, the Globetrotter 45, I am designing a one-off version for cored composite version with Core-Cell core and vinylester resin. If it goes to production, the basic production laminates will be close to the one-off laminates because of these choices of core and fabrics. I do not know the builder yet, but certainly the builder will be well versed in these materials, and that's not too hard to find.
  6. cranky

    cranky New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2007
    Messages:
    28
    Location:
    where ever the boat is
    I agree totally. The only real drawback with cored is when there the outer skin has been breached and it has not been dealt with quickly. I know the various manufactures of cores say their products do not absorb water, I beg to differ. After you have seen someone drill hundreds of small holes to drain out moisture in the core material prior to repair you begin to wonder if it would be better to have a thicker single skin. I have seen it happen a couple of times, the initial damage looked more like a bruise than a gash but generally many square feet of core material was saturated with water.
  7. ESYD

    ESYD Member Removed

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2004
    Messages:
    17
    Location:
    St. Augustine, FL
    Yes, that happens more often than it should. Mostly I would bet that you could trace a soaked core back to a poor bond between the core and the skins, and also to the "slots between the blocks"--contoured core--which are natural pathways for water to get in. A well made boat, even with contour core, will have all the slots between the blocks filled with putty, and the skins 100% bonded to the core.

    This is one of the reasons that a one-off hull with strip-planked core has such a much higher degree of success than a female molded boat. In the one-off case, the skins are always going onto the core surface in full view both sides--you can see and take care of any voids--and if there are slots between the blocks, you can fill those before you laminate. There is no excuse for voids. In the female molded case, you are setting the core into the outside skin blind--you cannot see the joint to the outer sking at all, and you cannot see 100% how the slots between the blocks are filling. Best success comes with vacuum bagging the core into a putty like Core-Bond, and the core should also have bleed holes in it to allow some of the putty to come all the way through to the side that you can see under the vacuum bag.
  8. RNB

    RNB New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2006
    Messages:
    7
    Location:
    Sydney, AUS
    Thanks for this perspective. Certainly it would seem that contoured core availability has made a significant contribution to improvements in skin/core bonding. The danger of core penetration is I guess why you see some boats with a single skin below the water line and/or kevlar reinforcement and a sacrificial bow to cope with dangerous impacts. These comments have helped - so thanks. RNB.
  9. Innomare

    Innomare Senior Member

    Joined:
    Dec 5, 2004
    Messages:
    233
    Location:
    The Netherlands
    An interesting alternative I saw at METS is a new core-material called 3D-core. It's kind of middle of the road between cored composites and single skin.

    The core material is composed of hexagonal foam cells. Infusion is to be done with inside and outside skins together and creates a resin-filled cross connection between the skins. The end-result is a composite with honeycomb-like foam cells in it.
    Because of the cross-connection between inner and outer skin, it's impact resistance is a lot better than with a conventional cored composite. For the same thickness you end up stronger. For the same strenght, I don't know if it's lighter or heavier.

    One other advantage is that the 3D-core material can be bent at will, making it easier to create complex shapes (see attached pic).

    As far as I know, the material is not yet approved by any class society.
    The not-very-informative website is at http://www.escomposite.de/.

    Bruno

    Attached Files:

  10. AMG

    AMG YF Moderator

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2004
    Messages:
    5,375
    Location:
    Sweden
    Thanks Innomare,

    This material seems easy to work with, but I am afraid that with vacuum infusion you will have to build a thicker outside skin to avoid visible patterns on the surface..?

    On our 40' powerboat we are using precut Divinycell which has an even outside and still we can see hints of a structure through the gelcoat, which has to be rubbed and polished for a perfect finish.

    For areas around the keel we have solid GRP and the transom has Divinycell with higher density for strength. Lamination is with vinylester and all stringers have carbon fibre reinforcements.

    Attached Files:

  11. RNB

    RNB New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2006
    Messages:
    7
    Location:
    Sydney, AUS
    cored vs single skin hulls

    Thanks Innomare. I have to say that the www.escomposite.de web site is possibly one of the worst I have ever seen. Nevertheless they seem to have an interesting product but possibly from my (risk management) perspective a little too new for me to take on board at this stage. I need proven materials technnology which means I go with what is known and welll understood I think.
    Thanks for your input. RNB
  12. tri - star

    tri - star New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2007
    Messages:
    32
    Location:
    Vancouver, B.C., Canada
    Sandwich vs

    To RNB
    I hasten to state, that I am not "religious" in this matter.
    My observations are based on real world, hands on experience.

    To give you, perhaps, a clearer view of theory vs actual
    perfomance, we submit the following:
    - First, the theory of a cored hull being lighter than a solid hull,
    is based on a very basic engineering rule:
    - " That a beams strength goes up - by the square of the depth."
    i.e.
    Two 2 x 4's nailed together - side by side - will be twice as
    strong as a single 2 x 4 when resisting a downforce.
    Whereas; a SINGLE 2 x 6 is ALSO twice as stong as a single 2 x 4.
    Resulting in also doubling the strength - while only increasing the
    weight - equivilent to a 2 x 2.
    (The reason why this so - is quite fascinating - but requiires a
    longer explanation than you might have patience for today.)
    - So, it has been suggested by others;
    that the core functions as many little I - beams carrying load from
    the outside skin to the inside skin.
    - It follows: that a wide core, sandwiched between two skins can be
    lighter than a thinner, single skin.
    All the above is well known and can be demonstrated in the lab.

    HOWEVER........theres always a however......
    In said lab - inconvenient realities surface.
    Observing the results of HIGH density core samples - tested to
    destruction - I noted an interesting phenomenon.
    The fractures often resulted in an elegant parabolic line moving from
    one skin to mid center. Then becoming hyperbolic, as the force moves
    on to the other skin . Like so: ~

    - Just as is shown in diagrams in engineering text books !
    Practice and theory, actualy supporting each other. Amazing.....
    ( Note: the I'm using the word " elegant " as used by engineers.
    As in....using the least amount of material for a given result.)

    After this, however things become less sure.....
    With LOWER density cores, shear lines were much less elegent.
    Fracture lines were more jagged and varied.

    These are the conclusions I made fom this:
    First, designers and engineers are lead astray by said, text books,
    that define the force at mid point of the core, as ZERO.
    It well might be. For a milli second. As 8000 lbs of force travel
    through the core, from one side to the other.
    But everybody got excited. Making the PRESUMPTION that zero
    force, for a moment, means that you can get away with VERY
    skinny, little I - beams. Like honeycomb cores.
    Where AIR is the main component!

    This does work. In theory and practice. For the first couple of
    excursions offshore.....
    However, it can only work , if stability of the skin(s) and core
    are maintained.
    That is; the little honeycomb I - beams must stay at 90 degrees to
    the skin(s) surface.
    Note: A loss of only 2 or 5 degrees from verticle, of a post or
    I - beam results in loss of strength of 90 % or more.

    This brings us, to perhaps the least appreciated element at work here.
    Let us PRESUME that all is well and good - and your low density foams
    and honeycombs are performing as effectivly as they do in the lab.
    Transmitting force, seamlessly, from one side of the hull to 'tother.
    However, as I've stated, these I - beams must maintain said,
    verticle alignment.
    MAINTANCE OF THE CONNECTION OF THE CORE MATERIAL TO THE
    SKINS IS ESSENTIAL.
    As delamination of only one skin, can result in going from 200%
    greater strength over a solid material to 25% less strength than
    said, solid material.
    The key is: THE SHEAR VALUE BETWEEN CORE AND SKIN(S).

    Going back to the " elegant" diagram.
    If the total resistance of the composite is a value of 12,000
    And even if the skins can sustain this load alone - it does not follow,
    that resistance can be maintained where the skin and core connect.

    As in the case of a hull, one inch thick, at mid point we may have
    almost zero force. However as we follow the break line... At 1/16"
    from the mid point - it has climbed to 1000 or more - and at a 1/4"
    from mid point - the force has jumped quickly to 6000. As we
    continue along the break line - within a 1/8" of the surface we can
    now be close to 10,000.
    Note: We have not yet reached the breaking strength of the
    TOTAL composite.
    However; if the core can not maintain a force of 10,000........
    It will fail BEFORE the skin will. Shear will take place where skin
    and core used to be connected. ( Where you cannot see it.)

    It follows: that, in my experience, resistance to delamination is
    DIRECTLY related to the shear strength of the core
    - NOT the skin material.
    The actual bonding of core to skin - is a bit of a red herring.
    Not that I'm overwhelmed, with how well disimilar materials
    can be stuck together. At the best of times.
    Even if you have a good bond. If the core has failed in IT"S SELF
    - you will have failure in the structural integrity of the total
    composite anyway.

    Therefore; as density is usualy a function of overall strength,
    denser ( heavier ) cores will be less prone to delamination or
    internal failure.
    It also follows; that the closer the core is to the density of
    the skin the less likely that delamination will occur.

    It also, unfortunatly, follows that the combined weight of the
    denser core and skin - are know approaching that of a solid skin!

    So why bother.......?!!

    In my own situation I will happily spec out honeycomb laminates
    for INTERIOR structures.
    For offshore, expedition yachts - given the above, it will be
    solid skin below the waterline.

    Hope....all above helps -and has not served to confuse
    things further!
    I think, by now, you now see that this topic is a lot more
    complicated than might be expected.

    Cheers !
  13. MaxResolution

    MaxResolution Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2007
    Messages:
    159
    Location:
    Little Rock
    Getting to the core of it

    But, rolled aluminum, welded to tabbed aluminum, welded to aluminum, with a vacuum in the middle, how might this hollow material differ? I know the patent holder, and best of all I sure like the stated 'R90' rating, in his 48mm profile!

    Honeycomb structures for interior applications makes the most sense to me anyway you look at it. MDF is abysmal when drenched. I like this all wood product called multi-core. (Assuming it's a real marine glue.) And of course, lots of top woodworkers have turned to vacuum-forming for their curvilinear veneered stuff.

    Battleships aside, I still don't get why a steel boat with a well thought lead keel can't brush up against the occassional reef. Are there any specs to persuade one that this is possible?
  14. RNB

    RNB New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2006
    Messages:
    7
    Location:
    Sydney, AUS
    tri-star. Yes your analysis makes alot of sense and in fact I have received a similar argument (in much briefer form) from Oyster in the UK. Their emphatic statement was that since they wanted to keep their customers afloat, they would always build single skin hulls! Cored hulls in their view are simply unable to withstand penetrating impacts (though I seem to remember that SP Technologies (Gurit as they are now called) did some work for them with their SPRINT system 18 months or more ago). The only other advantage of a high density cored hull I feel, even if it does get close to the weight of a single skin hull, is the thermal and sound insulation properties it provides, which are important on a cruising boat. Also, more recently German Frers said in an email to me that (most) new Swan's are now going to be built with cored hulls, because of the recent development of core shapes which can be produced specifically to follow hull lines, delivering a significantly better bond between skin and core, and enabling a much simpler (lower cost) build process for production boats (though the current Swan web site does not support this it seems). There is also the design/engineering dimension of having a sacrificial bow, with a "pram" bow remaining, in case of mid ocean collison with a container. The other element of this debate is the resin used where it is clear to me that epoxy is far and away the best to use, given its bonding properties at various temperatures and its much greater resistance to water penetartion than alternatives. But this remains a complex area and I appreciate your views and thoughts (and hope I'm not transgressing by mentioning names in this forum but it serves to demonstrate the differences of opinion here from some respected parties). Best. RNB
  15. Ju52

    Ju52 Senior Member

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2006
    Messages:
    148
    Location:
    Frankfurt
  16. MaxResolution

    MaxResolution Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2007
    Messages:
    159
    Location:
    Little Rock
    Nida-core

    I found them last year via a woodworker's link, and thought 'dumb site.' Note their flat panels say laminating with formica, aluminum, corian- 'to be advised.'

    Very well, back to hulls. You guys have numerous issues at play. Acoustics and insulation still top my list, whatever the substrate. Epoxys and vinylized polymers are clearly advantageous, and quite case specific. Will we ever get around to bouyancy? Overall scale, and thickness?, or am I just delusional to preclude that laminates (over, say 8m) are not seaworthy in the least?
  17. ESYD

    ESYD Member Removed

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2004
    Messages:
    17
    Location:
    St. Augustine, FL
    Tri-star makes some valid points, but he seems to present it in a way that suggests engineers "forget" about the shear loads within cores. This is not the case. We engineers deal with both the face stresses and the core shear stresses all the time when engineering cored laminates. Core shear is not to be ignored, and in fact the ideal sandwich laminate will fail in the core and in the skins at the same time. In reality, one or the other (core or skins) will fail first, and the key is to achieve as much factor of safety in the design that is reasonable and consistent with weight, cost, and ease of lay-up.

    Regarding MaxResolution's remark about steel hulls for this hypothetical sailboat (20-25 meters), certainly that can be done. All it takes is to engineer the boat to the material at hand--it's done every day. I am consulting right now on the rig for steel schooner of just that length, and boat designs can be found around the world from a number of notable designers.
  18. tri - star

    tri - star New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2007
    Messages:
    32
    Location:
    Vancouver, B.C., Canada
    CORED hulls - Part TWO

    To RNB:
    This reply will be shorter - I promise.
    ( My daughters tell me, I some times pontificate a little long.....)

    Yes, I agree with you - epoxy has merit. Being more resistant
    to water than many materials.
    People will say - but it costs twice as much.
    Perhaps.........because it's TWICE as good ?

    Here is a hull layup of a vessel designed AND built by us,
    that has stood the test of time.
    - X.layers of high grade F. Glass. ( On the water side.)
    - One layer of Western Red Cedar.
    - One layer of Fir.
    - (2) X. layers of F. Glass. (On the inside.)
    All held together with aircraft grade epoxy.

    Note: In this layup; the core is - difinatively - HIGH density !

    Note: It's common practice for boatyards to put more glass on
    the outer, waterside of the core, than on the inside. Mostly for
    cosmetic reasons.
    However, our layup is ONLY concerned about structural integrity.
    With ours - there is more glass on the INSIDE.
    Because: Very high load impacts on the water side will more than
    likely, cause failure to start on the INSIDE......
    - As the rock just impacted, is creating a COMPRESSION loading
    on the outside of the hull.
    - And a TENSION load internaly.
    - So often: failure starts INSIDE the vessel.
    - As glass and carbon fiber are there to take tension loads:
    It seems logical, to me - to beef up the area that most
    needs to resist tension - with more tension resisting materials,
    Than to do so, on the outside of the hull.

    Cheers !
  19. tri - star

    tri - star New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2007
    Messages:
    32
    Location:
    Vancouver, B.C., Canada
    Ship Yard Experts

    To RNB

    This reply will be shorter still........... I promise !
    You indicated, RNB that you would like conclusive
    scientific evidence re: cored hulls. Don't we all !

    Some well engineered and well crafted vessels with
    sandwich construction HAVE made many ocean
    crossings. No debate about it.

    You have had the benifit of disussing the pros and
    cons, with various experts and manufacturer's
    representatives. All of us - including myself - might
    have vested interest in these concerns. Now, I'd
    suggest, you conclud your research with a simple, low
    cost procedure.

    Go down to some boat yards. Close to quiting time.
    Walk past the front office. Avoid anyone wearing a tie!
    Talk to the guy with the grungyest overalls.
    Take HIM for a beer.........
    Ask HIM, what boats he dreads showing up again in the
    yard for repairs.

    To be clear. We HAVE produced cored boats - and will
    do so in the future. Also, our vessels seldom show up for
    repairs. Even the ones built 25 plus years ago.
    So, presumeably, we know what we are about.

    Regards.
  20. RNB

    RNB New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2006
    Messages:
    7
    Location:
    Sydney, AUS
    Thank you one and all for your input and contributions on this subject. My concluding thoughts at this stage is to go for an advanced composite hull, that is, probably a carbon, kevlar, e-glass, Corecell, Epoxy sandwich with a sacrificial bow (yes I do believe epoxy is twice as good even if it is more expensive; though you are better to have a white rather dark blue hull given its thermal properties). I would also ideally like to go prepreg rather than resin infusion (finer unidirectional fibres rather than larger open woven fibres necessary for resin infusion). And finally but most importantly I will find a boat yard who has developed substantial experience in these building methods and really knows what they are doing. Again thanks to all. Regards. RNB.