Let's talk Navigation / Chart software

I bought Coastal Explorer for the simple reason that it updates all NOAA charts (that you want) in both raster and vector for free. The NOAA charts, especially the raster, are the standard for all charts. The Notices to Mariners corrections are there first. Because of the expense of proprietary charts like Nobeltec, Garmin, and the others, it's virtually guaranteed that there will be a lot of reliance on outdated charts over time. Although some may argue that "they're not making Real Estate anymore", there are some significant changes after a storm like Sandy. The other issue is that most non-NOAA charts are vector based, which means that every zoom level has different features included and omitted, and that's based on human judgement. I remember motoring within 100' of a big, red buoy in the shipping lane entrance to San Francisco and not finding it on either Nobeltec or Garmin raster charts until I zoomed down to an unusable range. It showed on the raster, though.
Other than that, I still prefer my no longer supported "The Cap'n" for ease of use. Maybe I'm just used to it.

I dislike Raymarine for several different reasons and many other Captains do as well. Furuno Navnet would be my first choice, and there is a reason the majority of commercial boats utilize furuno as well. Garmin would be a far second choice........

Navigation is only about one thing: Best Accuracy. If you want to rely on proprietary cartography that is a secondary (Primary?) income stream that is updated annually or at greater intervals, by all means: Go with the pretty colors.
If your navigation software does not access the latest corrected NOAA charts, then you have second best. Don't think for a minute that Navionics, C-Map, Jeppeson, Garmin or any other company is trying to outspend your tax dollars to make a superior product to what NOAA puts out In fact, the NOAA data is the Free source of their product. When they get around to it.
To be clear, I don't work for NOAA. I did work for the worlds first, accurate, land-based navigation company back in the days before GPS. That company developed the most accurate and sophisticated digital cartographic paradigms known at the time.
Ultimately, it comes down to this. For US waters, NOAA raster charts have all of the latest information that is available. NOAA vector charts, just like all other vector cartography, is the reader's digest version.
As is always the case: A prudent mariner never relies on a single source of information to determine his/her position.

Hi there MBevins,

First I'll agree with what others have said even if it is not the answer you want; redundancy, paper charts, prudence, raymarine sucks, etc. Now this is my answer to your question:

1. Personally: I have used Navionics Platinum charts (3D), lots of functions, lots of money! ($200+ per region). It is good if you want to invest a lot.

2. A very dear friend of mine who lives 9 months every year on the water cruising and is not computer savvy: Will not change from Maptech. He bought it because it updates both vector and raster maps directly from NOAA and for free and because it is easy to go through and reasonably priced.

3. Most all navigation equipment have software versions that use same maps and are linkable to the system either by cable directly to the unit or by wired/wireless network. Check your equipment for what works with it, this will be the best in my opinion because all your planning can be directly updated and synchronized with your glass units. Also your computer will be another unit in the system which serves the prudence and redundancy elements you have been advised about.

Hoping this answers your question.

Keep us up on your choice!

Cheers,
Alf

Pascal; does it have NMEA out to the autopilot?
MBevins; my issue with vector charts is that although they're digitized from raster charts, there are depth contours, buoys and obstructions that are not shown at certain zoom levels. That can be an issue, like the channel buoy that wasn't displayed on approach to San Francisco. Otherwise, vector charts can be more accurate, since additional data can be incorporated, like satellite images or multiple charting sources, like Garmin's use of Explorer charts of the Bahamas.

I use Navionics downloaded onto my android tablet and find it to be up to date and accurate. It updates every time I turn it on but it also has another great feature, if I, or anyone else sees a navigation hazard, you can input the info directly into tha tablet and every one will see your info next time they turn it on.

I must be the only guy here that uses furuno max sea time zero and also have all the paper charts for the part of the world I will be traveling

travler

err no ...

i run the navnet 3d on board connected to my laptop running maxsea time zero ...

& have all the paper charts too ...