New Props ACME vs MICH WHEEL

Yes, once you dump some weight your max rpm’s will pick up. Which J&T engines do you have? If you stay at 80% off 2250 you will be ok. What rpm are you cruising at?

I like the Acme’s, they are CNC milled to a nice tolerance and should be relatively vibration free.

What model Michigan Wheel’s did you replace?

So those J&T 6-71TI’s are rated at 2500 rpm and should turn 2550 rpm to make everything “nice”.
You probably went up in DAR and are pulling more blade area than the MW props, that’s why I wanted to know the model.
While we are at it, which model of ACME props are you running?
I agree, like to run these at 1950 rpm.
Other thing - need to check full throttle at neutral idle at the dock to make sure you have full travel on the throttle sticks and the engine rack. The fun begins!

I like the cup as it gives you some extra lift in the stern, but the pitch is about 2” over if you can only pull 2250 rpm.

You may also want to verify the engine speed matches your gauges by checking with a photo tach.

HA ! Well put !

I would have ACME take care of it right away. They should cover this on their end if you gave them all of the Michigan specs.

The most conservative route is to prop your wheels for full load - full fuel, full water , no waste, all gear onboard. Prop it for 2550 rpm and you will get max life out of the DD’s.

I agree this seems to be a ACME problem if you gave them the right data. If you gave them low water and half fuel data, then you may have to circle back to that condition and see where you are at on rpm’s on these props.

I don’t like taking 3” of pitch out of new wheels, that doesn’t sit well with a correct propeller sizing. You have a medium cup, which is good for double cabin motoryacht that tend to squat. If the removal of 2” of pitch is too much and you push past 2575 rpm’s, you can go to a heavy cup and it will dial right in. We just need to know what loading condition (fuel and water) you started out at?

More on cup - it is a second variable that makes it a bit more difficult as you have to adjust pitch and potentially cup. Two variables now instead of one. You have a few choices:

1, get back to the right loading condition when you gave performance data to the prop shop.
2. remove cup and retest, assuming they used proper cup gauges, 1 thru 12, what number are you on, a 6 or?
3. Make decision with the new data - more pitch, more cup, what combination of the two?
4. Depending on the age, condition and model of the MW, it is not necessarily surprising to see a 3” swing in pitch, as blade shape and blade area are sure to be different.
5, losing pitch can be a bit of a bummer as you lose speed potential, but cruise is what matters. If it squats too much without cup and needs a little extra load at your desired operating condition, you will have to re-introduce some level of cup, which is not necessarily a bad thing. Focus on your desired cruise speed.

Lot’s to think about.

Do you know what RPM's you made at WOT with the pre-reengineered original wheels? Did they make proper RPM?

Then you should have seen 2530 on the original set?

WOT on 6-71TI's is 2500 rpm, and the No Load maximum rpm is 2700 on a healthy engine. You need to verify those data points.

Another question - how deep is the water where you are collecting your performance data? I prefer 3 to 4 x my draft as an absolute minimum, but really like to see 20' plus under my props to eliminate any shallow water effects.

I mentioned it to further eliminate other technical variables, there is a lot of technical documents available to Naval Architects on the topic, you can google and read as you like. True high speed planning hulls may see a resistance decrease in certain water depths but the propeller may also see a decrease in efficiency. Squatting, getting on plane (over the hump) are all affected negatively by shallow water depths.

In order to optimize propeller selection, get some decent water below you, at a minimum use half the length of your boat as a guideline. It makes the technical side of propeller selection that much simpler to not have to factor in reduced water depth.

I agree with this. On faster planning boats (25+ knots I see increased speed of about 2 knots in depths less than 2-3x the draft, slower boats like the OP's they tend to stay the same or slow down a bit a lot of times.)