Click for Mulder Click for YF Listing Service Click for JetForums Click for Nordhavn Click for Ocean Alexander

Need an opinion, IPS or Zeus?

Discussion in 'Technical Discussion' started by SHAZAM, Feb 15, 2010.

You need to be registered and signed in to view this content.
  1. 84far

    84far Senior Member

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2008
    Messages:
    794
    Location:
    Brisbane, AUS
    K1W1, thanks for the heads up, will try and find out. There saying it's the 3rd Generation 13ltr (12.8ltr) series. Cheers

    Far
  2. SHAZAM

    SHAZAM Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2008
    Messages:
    601
    Location:
    The Ghetto
    Biggest negative I've found to date against the Zeus is the fact that CMD only offers one size drive all the way from the smallest HP B series to the largest M11. This is no problem when you're running an M11 with the zeus but you lose efficiency when your trying to power that same drive with a smaller motor. Volvo has this covered with several different drive sizes, with the IPS the smallest HP package comes with a smaller drive unit therefore eliminating the need to drive an unnecessarily large drive with a smaller hp motor, not to mention that the smallest Volvo IPS drive is substantially smaller than the Zeus drive therefore taking up much less space under the cockpit.

    I don't understand why this is so since it appears as if ZF (company that makes the drive for CMD) has several different size drive systems available. Why is CMD only using one in their Zeus package?
  3. geriksen

    geriksen Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2007
    Messages:
    175
    Location:
    San Juan Puerto Rico
    One difference that matters to me is the fact that the zeus mounts vertically (90' to the waterline). The IPS sticks out of the bottom at whatever the deadrise angle is.
    I drove one IPS boat that banked so hard in a turn that I thought it was going to throw us all out. Speed sensitive steering made that even worse if you throttled back in the middle of a turn. The angle of the IPS drive makes it act more like an aileron than a rudder. When you turn the wheel to starboard, the starboard drive pushes water up and the port pushes water down. There is as much rolling force as turning force.
    When was the last time you saw rudders on an inboard boat that didn't stick straight down perpendicular to the waterline across the transom? In a typical inboard, the struts may be angled but the rudders are usually straight (vertical)
    (I could draw this better than I am explaining it)
    I am guessing Volvo did this to make adapting existing hulls to IPS easier but I don't like how it feels and it does not make sense to me.
    As another poster noted the Zeus requires cutouts/tunnels in the hull which would increase the cost to make the change and also change other aspects of the hull performance due to reduced buoyancy in the stern. However, in my opinion this is the correct way to do it.
  4. AMG

    AMG YF Moderator

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2004
    Messages:
    5,375
    Location:
    Sweden
    If you are developing a hull just for this kind of drives, you can of course find solutions to the problems you describe. But you have to build it in full scale to test it out, which can be expensive if you are totally wrong...
  5. NoRudder

    NoRudder New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2008
    Messages:
    34
    Location:
    Virginia
    Mitsubishi relationship is long gone

    K1W1, You do know your history. But that relationship is long gone. The IPS 2 is powered by the D11. This is the D9 with additional stroke and built in France actually. While the previous D4 and D6 are Volvo Penta only, larger stuff comes from Volvo Powertrain. Like in Volvo truck, Mack truck, Renault truck, Volvo bus and Volvo construction equipment besides Penta. The IPS 3 announced in London is a D13. This one is a 13 liter displacement, built in Sweden, and it has been in trucks for a while. The pleasure vessel rating is 900HP inboard so far. Also an in-line 6 but with twin aftercooled turbos, no supercharger.
    As you well know, the emissions regulations keep things advancing faster perhaps than boaters can really afford.

    Back to IPS or Zeus. First the boat better be designed from the start for this, not just a force fit to breathe new life into an old dog that is a poor fit. As was said, LCG must be right. Volvo has two positive things here in my eyes, experience with a wider variety of applications (they even tried catamarans I think in New Zealand), plus they have an entire system design for engine, drive and transmission. This means there are few others to point the blame at (finger pointing as we know it).
    There does not seem to be enough information about Zeus installations to gather good information. Lazzara did try it in the 76, but it was not in the shows like the 75 (quad IPS 1)and the 92 (quad IPS2). What about Sea Ray? Why are there not more models and more domination in the market? I read about their quad in a fishing style boat on the web, but I am told it was a striped hull with no interior.
    I have questions like all of you do. I am sold on these pleasure pods as my knees still hurt from 20 years ago when I reinstalled all the running gear on a 60 Hatteras. But only when done right.
  6. NoRudder

    NoRudder New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2008
    Messages:
    34
    Location:
    Virginia
    60 Hat?

    Shazam, was this a complete vessel or was the interior not included? I heard just a rumor about a boat they may have bought for test that was not the same as a finished product should be. Curious as well about why it was such a failure. Certainly a dramatic change from tradition. Can the blade area of the props possibly carry such a load?
  7. SHAZAM

    SHAZAM Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2008
    Messages:
    601
    Location:
    The Ghetto
    Norudder, this was an unfinished boat with no interior. I was told that it was a 60 hatteras hull that had QC issues that was given to Cummins for free as a test bed. After inquiring about this setup, my cummins rep told me that the boat was nothing more than a proof of concept for larger builders to show that the zeus could be used in a quad application.
  8. Port Power

    Port Power New Member

    Joined:
    May 31, 2010
    Messages:
    2
    Location:
    Cairns
    You are correct in the above, if hull deadrise is very flat then exhaust gasses can sit under the hull and be sucked back up the intakes. Volvo have put out a solution to this with a water inlet that bolts directly to the current inlet but has a nozzle that protrudes down a couple of inches so any air is trapped above the water inlet and not taken in!
  9. Port Power

    Port Power New Member

    Joined:
    May 31, 2010
    Messages:
    2
    Location:
    Cairns
    Efficiency


    To me you simply look at prop size! IPS can use a 435 hp engine to swing its props and via the Zeus system to swing same size prop CMD need to use almost 600hp! And a 4" exhaust above the waterline, I don't need that kind of droaning noise from any boat!
  10. Fishtigua

    Fishtigua Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2007
    Messages:
    2,937
    Location:
    Guernsey/Antigua
  11. K1W1

    K1W1 Senior Member

    Joined:
    Sep 30, 2005
    Messages:
    7,388
    Location:
    My Office
  12. AMG

    AMG YF Moderator

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2004
    Messages:
    5,375
    Location:
    Sweden
    I think it is a 2 inches.
  13. K1W1

    K1W1 Senior Member

    Joined:
    Sep 30, 2005
    Messages:
    7,388
    Location:
    My Office
    Hi,

    Thanks Lars, My question here was a double barreled one.

    Firstly I was curious to know if the Raw Water Inlet was the same size as the exhaust pipe would be, it would have to be pretty close for it to work without increasing the back pressure a lot when running.

    Secondly, I have never seen an Out-drive where the water was drawn in from the centre of the prop where many Out-drives have their exhausts, if the exhaust was elsewhere on the drive in place of the Raw Water inlet, what effect would all that gas have on the props function?

    I look forward to an IPS Enlightenment.
  14. Capt J

    Capt J Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2005
    Messages:
    14,432
    Location:
    Fort Lauderdale
    On a fishing vessel, sportfish etc or fast boat it is preferable to have the exhaust come out above the waterline. Aside from at the dock, when the vessel is moving you should not hear the exhaust inside the boat or not to the effect of it being bothersome if it is routed out the stern. The zeus exhaust can be routed underwater also. I have no experience with either system, but have not heard of any issues with the zues system like the issues I've been hearing with the volvo system.

    Rumor has it that Lazzarra switched to Zues due to warranty issues with Volvo and a general lack of warranty support.
  15. CaptEvan

    CaptEvan Senior Member

    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2006
    Messages:
    172
    Location:
    Great Lakes
    K1W1,

    The intake is flush with the hull surface on the fixed portion of the drive unit, the outer half of the sandwich that seals the enormous hole. It is a flat ss grate, and feeds a 2" hose to the pump. After its cooling circuit, the same size hose then ties into the exhaust and exits out the rear of the unit in the wash of the forward-facing props.