Click for Glendinning Click for Burger Click for YF Listing Service Click for Westport Click for Cross

Monte Carlo MCY70 fuel consumption

Discussion in 'General Yachting Discussion' started by MikkelFilskov, Oct 15, 2014.

You need to be registered and signed in to view this content.
  1. MikkelFilskov

    MikkelFilskov New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 2, 2014
    Messages:
    14
    Location:
    Dragoer, Denmark
    Hi everyone,

    I'm new to posting here, but been around for a while looking at all the many good threads.
    I currently have an eye on Monte Carlo yachts for reasons we can discuss in another thread, but looking at their MCY70 test from boatest.com it seems unreal data for fuel consumption at 650 RPM. Maybe you guys can explain how it can be a 70" MY can use around 1 liter of fuel pr km at 7.6 knots. This crusing speed also seems to have little dBA, so if you run up the engine from time to time to keep it warm, it could be the crusing speed for more than 3000 km?

    See stats here: http://www.boattest.com/boats/boat_video.aspx?ID=2748

    Are the numbers wrong? If no, wouldn't this hull be great for ocean crossings? I did read the thread about the missing rails, but that could be retro-fitted.

    Best regards, Mikkel
  2. AMG

    AMG YF Moderator

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2004
    Messages:
    5,380
    Location:
    Sweden
    This is from the article;

    "If the intention is to really put on some distance, better idle speed of 7.6 kn, the same cruise speed is an average trawler yacht, and she'll burn a combine 4 gph (15.1 lph) and keep going for 237 hours and 48 minutes and 1,799 nautical miles."


    When our 80-footer (from Delta Powerboats) was tested, she burned 16 lph at 7,5 knots with a range of 2.250 NM. This is with triple Volvo Penta IPS/1200 running 600 RPM. So the figures for the Monte Carlo 70 seems to be OK and not very low....
  3. olderboater

    olderboater Senior Member

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2013
    Messages:
    7,132
    Location:
    Fort Lauderdale
    Seem reasonable. Keep a couple of things in mind though. That's basically at idle. Go to 1000 rpm and you cut the mileage by 63%. The question is what speed will you actually run it. Until actually testing your engines and your set up I'd be very reluctant to set out on a trip depending on 1500 nm plus. The range drops to 656 nm at 1000 rpm.

    Most would be amazed at the range of some pretty large engines get at idle speeds. Just they aren't often run at that speed. A 100' Hatteras with twin 1900 CAT's and conventional drives gets 1.2 nmpg at 600 rpm for a range of 4920 nm. But at 1000 rpm and 10 knots it's only 2057 nm.
  4. MikkelFilskov

    MikkelFilskov New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 2, 2014
    Messages:
    14
    Location:
    Dragoer, Denmark
    Thank you for your replies.

    AMG: Im actually very surprised to find that MY this size also have a somewhat hidden trawler mode build in. Is this a mode that is considered safe for blue water crossing or does it needs to be driven at planning speed to handle rough sea? Comfort I believe is something that will be different from boat to boat, but speed is many times not the key aspect for me. Going there is as much part of the journey as the rest. I do appreciate the possibility however to do short runs at speed when doing short cruises with friends and family.

    Olderboater: I would not buy a vessel in this price range without proper sea-trials, but this does change my thinking of looking into +50 feet due to the additional space and more attractive trawler mode. Smaller yachts seems to have a much smaller Hull displacement speed
  5. AMG

    AMG YF Moderator

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2004
    Messages:
    5,380
    Location:
    Sweden
    I think you should look at it the other way, to make short runs at idling speeds and normally run at "design speed", which is somewhere between 20 and 30 knots...
  6. YachtForums

    YachtForums Administrator

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2002
    Messages:
    20,379
    Location:
    South Florida
    BT's reviews have become much more comprehensive in recent years, but are clearly weighted toward advertisers, which can be cause for concern. IMO, their coverage could be directed at more worthy recipients.
  7. olderboater

    olderboater Senior Member

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2013
    Messages:
    7,132
    Location:
    Fort Lauderdale
    Perhaps as users we might be more worthy, but we don't pay as well.

    BT and PMY and others are heavily positive and designed to remain in the good graces of builders. However, if one goes in knowing that every boat will get a positive review, then they can still get some useful information. You can find out certain features, almost like an expansion of the information on the builder's site. Then the one benefit I do find is the tests. I've found the speeds, the fuel usage and the decibel levels to be beneficial and reasonably accurate. Even within the reviews I've occasionally found useful information. As they write a glowing review, there will sometimes be that one thing they aren't as fond of. Translated that means "I really disliked this aspect."

    While I love the reviews here most, often times to gather information on a boat you take any source you can find. Also, the tests are something one has to search for as the vast majority of online reviews do not have tests available.

    Basically I'd say reader beware, just as you would if reading on the builder's site. They are not unbiased independent reviews. But a discriminating reader can pick up useful information. Oh and one other thing is that each reviewer has their personal bias's, just as we do. One, for instance, does not like or see the need for lower helms. So he reviewed a model we were looking at and gave it glowing reviews for using that space for a country kitchen. We strongly disliked that. They all have their preferred speeds as well. They might not mesh with yours.
  8. MikkelFilskov

    MikkelFilskov New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 2, 2014
    Messages:
    14
    Location:
    Dragoer, Denmark
    Olderboater: I have to agree 100% ...and this advertising style reviews are more less becoming the standard for any reviews of costly products. Take out the stuff you need and follow up with information elsewhere - still all this won't make up for real life experience with a product since we all have our own blue elephant.

    AMG: Currently I'm the proud owner of a small 20 feet run-about which I like to use for short full-throttle trips to Copenhagen, but many times during the summer I bring my family on trips to Sweden, other parts of Denmark and on those trip we prefer to do hull speed unless the water is flat. Most of my guest don't like to be smacked around on waves, it's colder in the wind from the speed, and harder to talk and listen to music = I found myself doing more slow speed than full throttle action and I believe it would be the same if I in a few years bought a MY. All this said, I don't have your experience with yachts this size and I might look back in a few years and laugh of my posts here. Is there any reason that a MY would not be good to handle like I do today with my run-about? Safety, comfort, maintenance etc?

    I appreciate the feedback here and it will most definitely be including in my purchase thoughts.
  9. AMG

    AMG YF Moderator

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2004
    Messages:
    5,380
    Location:
    Sweden
    Most boats are designed for a certain purpose, but many can of course be used in different ways. So the short answer is that it is always better for the boat to be used than not used at all. In fact, many fast boats seems to be used in slow motion these days...
  10. MikkelFilskov

    MikkelFilskov New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 2, 2014
    Messages:
    14
    Location:
    Dragoer, Denmark
    Thanks. That was the answer I was hoping for but wouldn't take for granted with my limited experience. It broadens my options for better and for worse ;)

    Any exiting alternatives to MC70 that you could recommend to look at knowing my above preference? I'm okay with the trawler concept - speed really isn't the key-factor, but the look should be more modern than the average trawler to catch my attention. I wonder why nobody seems to make a regular styled MY with a trawler hull and engine setup... Most MY seems to be used at low speed and as vacation homes anyways and by looking at other treads in here people searching for ocean crossing MY actually have the specs for a trawler, but seem to have a hard time finding a trawler that makes their heart beat faster.
  11. gr8trn

    gr8trn Senior Member

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2012
    Messages:
    739
    Location:
    OR/CA
    Mikkel,
    Like you, I to am the proud owner of a mid 20' bowrider that I use to go fast and trailer occasionally to lakes. My choice for a cruising boat was a 50' Californian Veneti from Navigator yacths. While I cruise the Columbia River out of Portland OR and use her for a weekend retreat I do not find that I cruise at planing speed. We prefer the 10-12 knot cruise by far. Noise, traffic is easier to manage, fuel consumption to name a few. Plus we come from a larger sail boat for cruising and 10-12 knots seems quite fast. She will cruise quite happily at 20 knots and WOT 29 knots if we choose which is what drew us to her versus a trawler.

    In addition we like the large aft cockpit and swim platform for the dinghy.

    She is a 50' pilot house style so no fly bridge to keep clean and like I said we have the bowrider for open air fun in the sun. Besides we keep a 13 foot skiff with a 40 horse that is a blast to launch and zip around on.

    While Navigator is out of business there are plenty of similar vessels. Since you have your eye on larger vessels that are not trawlers I would steer you toward the new SeaRay 650L (non fly bridge version).
    http://www.searay.com/page.aspx/pageid/160931/L-Class.aspx

    Sabre 66 Dirigo:
    http://sabreyachts.com/dirigo-66-motoryacht/sabre-66-dirigo-overview

    Just to think of a couple of new options.

    Have fun!
    -Greg
  12. MikkelFilskov

    MikkelFilskov New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 2, 2014
    Messages:
    14
    Location:
    Dragoer, Denmark
    Hi Greg

    Thats very much like me. I really like the SeaRay - what a practical beauty. It seems almost impossible to find the price for her just yet, so will keep an open eye :)

    The Sabre is surely a fine boat but the styling is not what Im into right now.
  13. Natuzzi

    Natuzzi Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2011
    Messages:
    90
    Location:
    Portorož
    How about Azimut Magellano series? It seems to me it could tick your boxes regarding design...
    And another question, can you damage the engines runnig them for longer periods on idle speed? There is a story around here about a guy that went from Dubrovnik to Portorož on idle speed and had to replace/rebuild engines afterwards....
  14. MikkelFilskov

    MikkelFilskov New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 2, 2014
    Messages:
    14
    Location:
    Dragoer, Denmark
    That's definately something of a concern. Anybody else heard about this happen before?
  15. Capt J

    Capt J Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2005
    Messages:
    14,435
    Location:
    Fort Lauderdale
    Yes, all in all E rated or pleasure rated diesels are designed to run at cruise speed/ 80% load. Running them at dead idle does result in dirtier cylinders, incomplete combustion and too much fuel which can wash the liners out prematurely as well as carboning up the exhaust ports, turbo's etc. . Modern electronic diesels do a much better job at metering the fuel and such, but running a diesel at dead idle speed for 6 days straight is going to do some damage. I do run them at 1000 rpms for 6 hours, then up to cruise for 30 minutes and this seems to be a good compromise. Granted there are times you're going to stay below 800 rpms for a few days in a yachts life. Having to take the ICW in places, the Erie Canal and on and on......But doing it intentionally at 650 rpm's for pro-longed periods of time is going to create some excessive wear. Also a planing yacht like the Monte Carlo is not going to handle a sea-state very well at 650 rpms...... at 9-10 knots it probably would, but not at 6.5 knots.
  16. MikkelFilskov

    MikkelFilskov New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 2, 2014
    Messages:
    14
    Location:
    Dragoer, Denmark
    Okay, I see the issue. The solution you suggest could that work for longer cruises if you did like 1-2 hour @ 650 rpm then 1000 rpm or cruise for 30 min? That would still give a great range to the boat, but all this shouldn't of course result in a messed up engine.

    Regarding the seaworthiness at slow speed how bad has the weather to turn before you believe that would become an concern?
  17. Capt J

    Capt J Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2005
    Messages:
    14,435
    Location:
    Fort Lauderdale
    You could run them for say 4-6 hours at 650 rpms, we do it all of the time on the ICW where we cannot throw a wake (sometimes longer than that). The problem is, you're not going to maintain good steerage and just wallow around in the ocean. Diesels (2350rpm) get great fuel economy up to 1000 rpms. Personally I wouldn't run them below 800 rpms, but then after 6 hours I would run them at 80% load for 30 mins then back down. 1000 rpms is a good compromise of speed, comfort, and fuel burn most of the time. If you're this concerned about fuel, you're looking at the wrong boat. Perhaps a trawler should be considered or a sailboat.
  18. olderboater

    olderboater Senior Member

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2013
    Messages:
    7,132
    Location:
    Fort Lauderdale
    We often talk about wind and current, but rarely about the force of waves. Waves that are breaking at 2 meters per second are actually 3.9 knots. If you're in wind, current, waves or some combination in a boat that is cutting through them that's one thing. But you're not talking of doing that in a 70' Monte Carlo with a planing hull. At 650 rpm, 6.5 knots you're a bit of a toy being moved around by mother nature. Now you can adjust your autopilot or take the helm and continue at that speed in rough conditions. But it will require more work, get you there much slower, and be less comfortable than 1000 rpm and 10 knots. Our Riva's disavow any knowledge of 6.5 knots or 650 rpm and would very much get tossed around in anything more than 4' at that speed. Really don't track well in perfectly smooth water at that speed, plus the engines are not tuned for it. They'd far prefer 40 knots. Our bigger boats can handle it, but not sure we could as it feels as if you're not moving. They could be adjusted to track decently at that speed, but in any sort of rough conditions then the power of mother nature is almost equal to what you're getting from the engines so you're working more to offset the conditions than to propel the boat. Plus not the way those engines are set up to run. For those speeds need more a small engine, designed for continuous operation and heavy loads. Ours are large engines designed for fast vessels with low load factors. And yes I know a 499,000 lb displacement doesn't sound like it would be low load but it is with 5790 hp. And the Monte Carlo with a 42 ton displacement and 2400 hp would be the same.
  19. MikkelFilskov

    MikkelFilskov New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 2, 2014
    Messages:
    14
    Location:
    Dragoer, Denmark
    I see. 650 rpm would only be suitable for calm sea and I should not depend on calm seas for a extended ocean voyage. 1000 rpm would be more realistic for that scenario but still not ideal. This also means the needed 2500 - 3000 km range is out of reach with this vessel. Shame. I guess fuelbladders on the deck could be an idea, but concerned about the stability of the boat with these bladders filled with +200 gallons of fuel.

    It's not just about range when I search for boats, and Trawlers thus far just doesn't do it for me...a sailboat would surely rank higher. I'm very fond of the layouts of boats like MCY 70 and similar and I truely love the designs.

    Life is full of comprimises, just choose yours wisely, as they say ;-)
  20. olderboater

    olderboater Senior Member

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2013
    Messages:
    7,132
    Location:
    Fort Lauderdale
    When we were looking, one thing we found was that even in larger yachts, the "Euro boats" tended to lack range. Sunseeker, Ferretti, Princess, Monte Carlo and others. It seemed to be displacement and range or semi-displacement and planing without range. And that wasn't just because of the fuel usage, but a great deal of that was simply the size of fuel tanks. Their target seems to be the Mediterranean where the typical user doesn't require that much range.