| |  | Asking designers opinion |  | | |
12-16-2007, 04:04 PM
|
#16 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: I have an old homestead about 3 hours drive west of Sydney but I am hardly ever there
Posts: 379
|
Well if you raise the issue and document that fact then if there is a problem at least you can go back to them to fix it.
|
| |
12-16-2007, 04:07 PM
|
#17 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Greece
Posts: 161
|
It happens to be in Italy right now, so tomorrow it will be the first issue to discuss with the project manager
__________________
If U arent thoroughly confused, U arent thoroughly informed
|
| |
12-16-2007, 05:08 PM
|
#18 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: Connecticut and Downeast Maine
Posts: 201
|
Make sure you put in a very strong specification for isolation of stainless steel fasteners in a carbon structure.
If you think aluminum and stainless react badly, you should see carbon fiber and stainless. Looks like a lot of fasteners will be screwed into that structure.
|
| |
12-16-2007, 05:32 PM
|
#19 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: Phoenix
Posts: 1,170
|
Just eyeballing the thing, I was wondering about that tubing myself. For appearance sake, if not strength, I would be tempted to replace it with a short length of mast from a sailboat? So the dimensions would be much, much larger than just 2 inches. Plus the sailboat mast material would have a very pleasing oval shape to it. Of course all those brackets would need to be redrawn ...
Kelly Cook
|
| |
12-16-2007, 05:56 PM
|
#20 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Greece
Posts: 161
| Quote: | Originally Posted by CaptPKilbride Make sure you put in a very strong specification for isolation of stainless steel fasteners in a carbon structure.
If you think aluminum and stainless react badly, you should see carbon fiber and stainless. Looks like a lot of fasteners will be screwed into that structure. |
two coatings of epoxy primer have been applied straight on the resin and then epoxy filler (we are in the middle of fairing tasks)
__________________
If U arent thoroughly confused, U arent thoroughly informed
|
| |
12-16-2007, 05:59 PM
|
#21 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Greece
Posts: 161
|
Just noticed that I have posted 108 times!!!
__________________
If U arent thoroughly confused, U arent thoroughly informed
|
| |
12-16-2007, 07:09 PM
|
#22 | | Publisher/Administrator
Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: South Florida
Posts: 10,318
| Quote: | Originally Posted by comship Just noticed that I have posted 108 times!!! |
Welcome to geriatric status Comship. You're officially a centurion now!
|
| |
12-17-2007, 12:09 AM
|
#23 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Greece
Posts: 161
|
It's my honour to be
__________________
If U arent thoroughly confused, U arent thoroughly informed
|
| |
12-17-2007, 06:19 AM
|
#24 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Bournemouth, southern England
Posts: 228
|  All that needs is a fairy on the top (joke)
IMO, theres too much weight, too high up on too small a footprint...I'd be concerned with the continual leverage this arrangement will transmit to the mounting points on the hoop top surface. Scale wise, those vertical tubes look more like 3" dia, but I'd go for 4" dia low down and try to spread the feet out wider. You may get quite a bit of vibration through this arrangement too, resulting in a pronounced wobbling of the very top end. It just looks very tall and skinny for the weight its carrying.
|
| |
12-17-2007, 11:12 PM
|
#25 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Greece
Posts: 161
| Quote: | Originally Posted by Garry Hartshorn Well if you raise the issue and document that fact then if there is a problem at least you can go back to them to fix it. |
The mast shall be constructed by 3" tube. Many thanks for your kind reccomendations
__________________
If U arent thoroughly confused, U arent thoroughly informed
|
| |
12-18-2007, 01:09 AM
|
#26 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: Phoenix
Posts: 1,170
|
Err, perhaps that drawing is just not filled out yet? But as it appears now, I'd say the concern from CODOG still stands - "too small a footprint".
Kelly
|
| |
12-18-2007, 09:08 AM
|
#27 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: I have an old homestead about 3 hours drive west of Sydney but I am hardly ever there
Posts: 379
|
Looks like a very different mast. I would once again be checking over the specs on all equipment to ensure you do not have issues resulting from proximity to other equipment.
|
| |
12-18-2007, 03:14 PM
|
#28 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Bournemouth, southern England
Posts: 228
|
The last pictures are obviously not to scale and rather pictorial...totally different arrgt from the original. So, if this is the revised arrgt, its almost impossible to comment as to the aesthetic or structural aspect due to the sketchiness of it all ? I'd now be worried by the practicality of cable entries and servicing of the various items, with the aparent lack of space between each item and the extremely thin mounting platforms for each item...access to the underside of the domes, hingeing the radar covers back etc etc (radar antennas hitting the structure)  Please tell me this isnt a build drawing from the yard ?
|
| |
12-18-2007, 10:19 PM
|
#29 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Greece
Posts: 161
|
I am sorry indeed its a different mast, I have uploaded wrong pics
__________________
If U arent thoroughly confused, U arent thoroughly informed
|
| |
12-19-2007, 01:16 AM
|
#30 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: Phoenix
Posts: 1,170
|
No harm. If anything, that is a relief to hear!
Kelly
|
| | |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | | | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Rate This Thread | Linear Mode | |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | All times are EST. The time now is 11:30 AM. | |