Click for Cheoy Lee
Click for Platinum
Click for Moonen
Click for MCC
Click For Dockwise
Click for Quantum
Go Back   YachtForums.Com > YACHT DESIGNERS > Yacht Designers Discussion > hull type

Login to YachtForums
Username
Password

Reply

hull type

 
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 10-09-2008, 04:20 PM   #1
hordos
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: prince george b. c. canada
Posts: 1
Question hull type

I would like to know if you can make a plaining hull work like a displacement or semidisplacement by lengthening or adjusting weight to keep the boat level as it pickes up speed.
hordos is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-2008, 04:35 PM   #2
AMG
YF Moderator
 
AMG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Sweden
Posts: 3,257
Hi,

A stepped hull is normally keeping it´s level at high speed if this is what you were asking.
AMG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-2008, 08:39 PM   #3
FISHTIGUA
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Guernsey/Antigua
Posts: 497
I think what Hordos was asking is can you make a semi-displacement hull from a planeing one.

Yes you can but you loose all advantages of both types and gain non of the benefits.

Fish
__________________
Fish happens!
FISHTIGUA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2008, 07:03 AM   #4
Ju52
Registered User
 
Ju52's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Frankfurt
Posts: 77
displacement glider

Are you looking for a displacement glider ...

like this http://www.alsphere.at ??

A nice wekend to all
Gerhard
__________________
In theory, theory corresponds to practice. In practice not.
Ju52 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-2008, 06:59 PM   #5
CODOG
Senior Member
 
CODOG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Bournemouth, southern England
Posts: 370
If I understand your question correctly, then yes you can. But as already stated above, you will begin to lose the benefit of a planing hull design, and also not have the full benefits of displacement / semi-displacement hull design. Your requirements as to size and maximum speed would be a major consideration in this question too.
It is possible to design a planing hull that does not sink by the stern / rise at the bow as it gains speed, climbs the hump and comes up onto the plane as a normal planing hull would, either by adding considerable length or moving the LCG a long way further forward...but this design would therefore not be able to plane in the accepted sense. It would begin to plane due to its basic design, but the amount of hull surface still in the water would have high drag, its flat running angle and weight biased fwd would tend to force the bow to push the bow wave out of its way (rather than riding up and over the top of it) and the net result would be a higher power required to drive it at a relatively slower speed, and rather inefficient fuel consumption. This is by now a 'planing' design so compromised that the designer would have probably changed tack toward some form of semi-displacement design some time before.
There are artificial means that can be employed to 'flatten out' a planing hulls natural running angle (trim tabs / wedges / transom plates etc), but anything that will effectively lift the stern / push the bow down is normally used just for slower speeds, before or just on the hump (this is what I'm guessing you are getting at) Also, at higher speeds, too flat a running trim on a planing hull may result in bow steer, chine running and straight line tracking problems.
There are a million permutations ranging between full-on displacement right up to fast craft that run high speeds with only the tips of the props and the tip of the keel and chine in the water...but they all compromise one or more qualities for the reward of excelling at others. Planing hulls will rise up at the bow in their attempt to climb the bow wave in order to ride atop the water rather than through it...its what they do...if you deliberately design one that doesn't, it will suffer in other areas of performance / economy / handling too.
This brings us back to the size you have in mind and the speeds you want from the hull ? The design requirement you hinted at in your initial post suggests a decent speed but with minimal change between static and running trim angles ? So far its leaning toward a chine-bilged, semi-displacement hull with waterjets.
CODOG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2008, 02:25 AM   #6
KCook
Senior Member
 
KCook's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 1,212
Methinks the best practical example would be tournament ski boats (Nautique, Mastercraft, etc). They do plane, with VERY little bow angle. But as already stated, this results in greater wetted surface, greater drag, less speed, and more fuel needed. Can be done however.

The other example would be high performance catamarans, which is not likely what the OP had in mind.

Kelly Cook
KCook is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2008, 02:53 AM   #7
Seafarer
Senior Member
 
Seafarer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Hudson River
Posts: 391
Quote:
Originally Posted by FISHTIGUA
I think what Hordos was asking is can you make a semi-displacement hull from a planeing one.

Yes you can but you loose all advantages of both types and gain non of the benefits.

Fish
^^ This.

Huckins (ok, ok, I already hear the groans) builds planing hulls that are designed to run from a standstill to top speed with no more than 3 degrees of bow rise. They are also fairly fast and fuel efficient boats.
Seafarer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-27-2009, 10:14 AM   #8
penta
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: nothing
Posts: 1
So maybe will be better to share my idea in this theme. I hope.
http://den-k-den.livejournal.com/10318.html

Something like:
<10 knots - displacement
10~20 wavepiercer
>20 - cat



P.S.: sorry for my Eng. - it's very difficult for me to use it.
penta is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-27-2009, 11:11 PM   #9
Capt J
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Fort Lauderdale
Posts: 957
Stretching a hull will increase the displacement speed. I run a 75' hatteras that was stretched 10' from a 65'. It picked up almost 2 knots at displacement speed and will do 10 knots at displacement speed up from 8-8.5knots. Cruising speed has slowed down a little. Weight and balance can slow down or speed up displacement speed.
Capt J is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-28-2009, 06:42 AM   #10
84far
Registered User
 
84far's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 130
hi there

check out the 'Mochi Long Range 23'. it does what your after i think. interesting hull design. and im starting to see a few boats come out with a similar shape/idea.

a Hobie Cat is a good example of a twin hull form.

but everything is a compromise. what u gain in one thing, you'll loose in another. fine out what u need the most in the design and head down that path. maybe a hydrofoiled boat?....

far.
84far is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are EST. The time now is 10:44 PM.

Click for Queenship
Click for Horizon
Click for Queenship
Click for Cheoy Lee
Click For Bloemsma van Breeman
Click for Sea Spirit


Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 2.3.3