| |  | 82' Viking SF in big seas... |  | | |
12-16-2008, 07:54 PM
|
#1 | | Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: NJ
Posts: 16
| Viking 82'
I realize this is not the largest sportfisherman, but I thought they were cool pics. The last picture is of a 64' versus the 82'. I know it may be hard to tell but the 64' is on the right.
|
| |
12-16-2008, 07:57 PM
|
#2 | | Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: NJ
Posts: 16
| More Pics
More pics
|
| |
12-16-2008, 08:09 PM
|
#3 | | Publisher/Admin
Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: South Florida
Posts: 11,836
|
Rampage,
These posts have been moved to the Viking forums. The last pic was accidentally deleted while re-sizing. If you want to add it again, feel free, but keep images under 640 pixels.
It looks like these shots were taken at the Port of Palm Beach (aka Lake Worth Inlet)... ?
|
| |
12-16-2008, 08:11 PM
|
#4 | | Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: NJ
Posts: 16
| Last pic
The bridge of the 64' is as high as the bow of the 82'
|
| |
12-16-2008, 08:15 PM
|
#5 | | Publisher/Admin
Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: South Florida
Posts: 11,836
|
Rampage,
I re-sized the pic for you. Please adhere to our image size rules; no larger than 640 pixels in width.
Thanks.
|
| |
12-17-2008, 06:35 AM
|
#6 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Cairo - Egypt
Posts: 510
| Quote: | Originally Posted by rampage38 The bridge of the 64' is as high as the bow of the 82' |
Wow........cool picture.
|
| |
12-17-2008, 07:12 AM
|
#7 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2005 Location: flensburg, germany
Posts: 502
|
__________________
Jannick Bruhns
you're welcome to correct my english
|
| |
12-17-2008, 08:42 AM
|
#8 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 2,582
| Quote: | Originally Posted by rampage38 The bridge of the 64' is as high as the bow of the 82' |
This picture reminds me of when I brought a client's 68 Sunseeker down to Lauderdale. I kept warning him that his boat was going to shrink (On Long Island it was an eye catcher). We pulled through the 17th St bridge and saw another Sunseeker. He asked if it was a 60 and I had to tell him that no it's about an 80.
__________________ "Some went down to the sea in ships." |
| |
12-17-2008, 03:32 PM
|
#9 | | Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: North America
Posts: 38
|
Nice size comparison! Very impressive!
|
| |
12-17-2008, 06:51 PM
|
#10 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: Guernsey/Antigua
Posts: 497
|
Fantastic photos, both boats are looking Goooooood!
Can I have the Jim Smith please?
Only joking,
Just
__________________
Fish happens!
|
| |
12-19-2008, 07:21 PM
|
#11 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: NY & FL
Posts: 137
|
I was out fishing the day those pics were taken- I was the only boat out beside the Viking 82. I drive the 65 Donzi "Sea Deuce" that the from the floating dock are taken from- yes it was Lake Worth inlet- Sailfish Marina, the charter dock to be precise. It was "Donzi" weather that day as several of us Donzi captains jokingly call it. I stayed out for an hour- the Viking came in after less than an hour- but I doubt they were fishing- I'm sure they went on a rough seas sea trial as many folks were on the boat including Pat Healy if my vision was not fooling me. The 82's bow is a monster- much larger than the 74. I have not been aboard yet, but it certainly looks like an impressive vessel.
|
| |
12-20-2008, 12:29 AM
|
#12 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2005 Location: Fort Lauderdale
Posts: 957
|
The smaller SF in front of the 82' really looks like a 61' Viking to me. I am almost positive of it. The 64' has different lines on the side of the house
|
| |
12-20-2008, 01:06 AM
|
#13 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: Hudson River
Posts: 389
| Quote: | Originally Posted by Capt J The smaller SF in front of the 82' really looks like a 61' Viking to me. I am almost positive of it. The 64' has different lines on the side of the house |
And why WOULD we trust the guy who was there taking the pictures anyhow? |
| |
12-20-2008, 01:16 AM
|
#14 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2005 Location: Fort Lauderdale
Posts: 957
| Quote: | Originally Posted by Seafarer And why WOULD we trust the guy who was there taking the pictures anyhow?  |
Because I ran a 2006 61 Viking SF, that looked EXACTLY like that one and there is a good chance that is the boat. Teak Transom, stbd side bridge ladder, same tower, mezzanine deck, same color. They did away with that ledge/angle a foot underneath the house windows on the sides of the house and the bow is higher on a 64. I may be mistaken though. But that really looks like the older 61. They made the boat sleeker and took away the hard angles of the 61 so it looks similar to the 82' and others.......
|
| |
12-20-2008, 01:19 AM
|
#15 | | Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: NJ
Posts: 16
|
I didn't take the pictures so I don't disagree. Actually after further analysis the 61 has more of a curve in its bow and this has that slight curve.
|
| | |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | | | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Rate This Thread | Linear Mode | |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | All times are EST. The time now is 06:47 PM. | |