Click for DeAngelo
Click for Westport
Click for Bertram
Click for Ferretti
Click for Moonen
Click for GPlink
Go Back   YachtForums.Com > GENERAL YACHTING DISCUSSION > Technical Discussion > Griffin vs. Racor

Login to YachtForums
Username
Password

Reply

Griffin vs. Racor

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 06-13-2012, 12:14 AM   #1 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Jimbo1959's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Stockton, CA
Posts: 42
Griffin vs. Racor

Just recently ran across a turbine type fuel water/separator filter manufactured by Griffin. Has anyone used these filters? How do they compare to Racor separator?
Jimbo1959 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-2012, 08:27 AM   #2 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 429
i have seen them on ebay and I am also interested in them because they seem to be extremely similar and take the same element only the purchase price is cheaper.

I do not know anyone who uses Griffins.
RT46 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-2012, 10:11 AM   #3 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Fort Lauderdale
Posts: 4,277
Just go with a Racor, it's a proven design that you never have issues with. I've found that you always get what you pay for. You buy a cheaper product and you have nothing but problems......
Capt J is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-2012, 12:11 PM   #4 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Marmot's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: 9114 S. Central Ave
Posts: 2,463
Quote:
Originally Posted by Capt J View Post
I've found that you always get what you pay for.
Have you ever done a refit?
Marmot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-2012, 01:12 PM   #5 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Melbourne, FL
Posts: 25
Racor vs Griffin filters

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jimbo1959 View Post
Just recently ran across a turbine type fuel water/separator filter manufactured by Griffin. Has anyone used these filters? How do they compare to Racor separator?
Griffin filters are Chinese made replicas of Racor filters. As to manufacturing
merits of the Griffins, I do not have first hand knowledge.

Ron Sparks
rgsuspsa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-2012, 01:54 PM   #6 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
K1W1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: My Office
Posts: 5,390
Hi,

I do not have any experience with them nor do I know anyone that has.

I have looked all over the net and do not find any negative comments on blogs/forums in reply to my searches.

I use a dual Racor 500FG on my gensets and change one filter every 10 days so I might try a box of these fellas and see if they last as long, keep the secondaries clean as long.
K1W1 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-2012, 03:06 PM   #7 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Fort Lauderdale
Posts: 4,277
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marmot View Post
Have you ever done a refit?
Yes, and when it comes to parts, you generally always get what you pay for. Same for fixing/repairing/rebuilding many junk parts during a refit. Many times the repair costs exceed the new cost of a part *not always*.

As for Chinese copies of a Racor, NO THANKS. Racor's are cheap enough that there is no need to buy chinese copies.
Capt J is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-2012, 04:28 PM   #8 (permalink)
Registered User
 
captholli's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Airports, Relief Engineer
Posts: 41
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marmot View Post
Have you ever done a refit?
Odd question Bill, where are you going with this inquiry?
captholli is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-2012, 05:22 PM   #9 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Marmot's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: 9114 S. Central Ave
Posts: 2,463
Quote:
Originally Posted by captholli View Post
...where are you going with this inquiry?
It was a sarcastic reference to the fact that only infrequently in yachting does one get what one pays for, or thinks one is paying for.

As far as a new entry to the market, sometimes a new guy can produce an equal or better product for the same or even lower price than the old tried and true item that may or may not match the quality standard it has come to represent.

Chinese knockoff? Guess where Racor filters and housings are manufactured.

If we refused to try the offerings of different manufacturers we would still be using tube type radars manufactured by American defense contractors on a production line built in 1943.
Marmot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-2012, 10:04 PM   #10 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Fort Lauderdale
Posts: 4,277
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marmot View Post
It was a sarcastic reference to the fact that only infrequently in yachting does one get what one pays for, or thinks one is paying for.

As far as a new entry to the market, sometimes a new guy can produce an equal or better product for the same or even lower price than the old tried and true item that may or may not match the quality standard it has come to represent.

Chinese knockoff? Guess where Racor filters and housings are manufactured.

If we refused to try the offerings of different manufacturers we would still be using tube type radars manufactured by American defense contractors on a production line built in 1943.
UMMMMM were'nt Dahl's and Separ's designed to be an improvement over Racors when they first were introduced? Dahl's were actually designed by the guy who origionally designed the Racor's. A direct copy of a Racor is nothing different, revelutionary, or changing anything.

It's like these blasted Algae-X's that Sunseeker thought was a **** good idea instead of installing Racor's or any other primary and relies on just the Man Common Rail primary's and secondaries, yet every MAN dealer and even MAN of North America's head engineer told me, they really SHOULD have racor's in front of them. Yet there is NO space in the engine room to mount Racor's. The Algae-X's macerate the algae so that the primary 10 micron filters stay crystal clean and the secondary filters (2 micron)which are twice as expensive and twice as hard to change, get plastered with Algae.......
Capt J is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-14-2012, 11:53 AM   #11 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Vancouver BC and Florida
Posts: 710
My neighbours 65 azimut with Mans has racors in front off to one side, no problem
dennismc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-14-2012, 02:52 PM   #12 (permalink)
Registered User
 
captholli's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Airports, Relief Engineer
Posts: 41
Personally I would love to see some company give Parker Hannifin (Racor) a run for their money competition wise with a good centrifugal / coalessor type of fuel filtration system as its a huge $$$ market / Kind of surprised that Alfa Laval hasnt jumped into the Static filtration market because they have the lock on centrifugal filtration from everything from Fuel, Ballast water, Milk and dairy etc, etc, I find that while Racor's do a good job their price point might be better if they had some serious competition.
captholli is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-14-2012, 03:21 PM   #13 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
K1W1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: My Office
Posts: 5,390
Hi,

These guys also make very good gear and have been involved in dairy etc for years.

Centrifugal Separators from GEA Westfalia Separator
K1W1 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-14-2012, 03:43 PM   #14 (permalink)
Registered User
 
captholli's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Airports, Relief Engineer
Posts: 41
Good point K1W1,
I've had a couple of Westfalia units onboard over the years but found them to be odd machines compared to the Laval units as far as cleaning and P.M. was concerned, I guess that I was weened on lavals and couldnt come to grips/love with the new animal. Funny that this technology apparently derived from the dairy sector as you and I both mentioned. It seems that now the big market $$$ is going to be ballast water purification as outlined by the IMO guidlines. Ohh, to just have a crystal ball that worked better!!
Who would have thought ballast water would've been an issue 20 years ago? or for that matter the new push for vessels in port to "Cold Iron" and shut down their Gens. for cleaner air around urban centers?? Times are a changing for sure.
captholli is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-14-2012, 09:15 PM   #15 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Fort Lauderdale
Posts: 4,277
Quote:
Originally Posted by captholli View Post
Personally I would love to see some company give Parker Hannifin (Racor) a run for their money competition wise with a good centrifugal / coalessor type of fuel filtration system as its a huge $$$ market / Kind of surprised that Alfa Laval hasnt jumped into the Static filtration market because they have the lock on centrifugal filtration from everything from Fuel, Ballast water, Milk and dairy etc, etc, I find that while Racor's do a good job their price point might be better if they had some serious competition.
I disagree. The fuel filter housings/assemblies last darn near the life of the boat and most of the time you don't even have to fix anything on them. They're not un-reasonable IMO........

The turbine filter elements on the other hand are by FAR the cheapest compared to the competitions filter housings such as Separ, Dahl, and most other's.
Capt J is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are EST. The time now is 05:59 AM.

Click for Cheoy Lee
Click for Walker
Click for McKinna
Click for JetForums
Click for Oceanco
Click for Bering


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2