| |  | Caution: Rough Seas Ahead |  | | |
09-24-2009, 11:53 AM
|
#31 (permalink)
| | Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2005 Location: flensburg, germany
Posts: 621
| Quote: |
Originally Posted by NYCAP123 Your post lost a few words there, but that plane and helo should be below deck where they can't get washed overboard. That's what, about $60m sitting there. | as far as i know, they're pretty good tied on the deck, and i suppose those just there for the reason, that the hangar might've been full. but even if not, i don't think the navy would run that ship in that storm if they wouldn't be sure about the planes and stuff.
|
| |
09-24-2009, 12:06 PM
|
#32 (permalink)
| | Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 6,487
| Quote: |
Originally Posted by brunick as far as i know, they're pretty good tied on the deck, and i suppose those just there for the reason, that the hangar might've been full. but even if not, i don't think the navy would run that ship in that storm if they wouldn't be sure about the planes and stuff. | You're talking about the same people who buy million dollar toilet seats. |
| |
09-24-2009, 12:29 PM
|
#33 (permalink)
| | Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: Inside
Posts: 27
| Quote: |
Originally Posted by brunick as far as i know, they're pretty good tied on the deck, and i suppose those just there for the reason, that the hangar might've been full. but even if not, i don't think the navy would run that ship in that storm if they wouldn't be sure about the planes and stuff. | well secured is one thing, but those craft are being subjected to potential damage. put another way, i would not want to be put on the catapult with that aircraft.
not being a carrier sailor, i would still say that carriers generally don't carry more aircraft than they can stow, which is why they have mission specific aircraft configurations.
Mike
|
| |
09-24-2009, 01:27 PM
|
#34 (permalink)
| | Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2005 Location: flensburg, germany
Posts: 621
| Quote: |
Originally Posted by NYCAP123 You're talking about the same people who buy million dollar toilet seats.  | hm, yeah, right... i guess there's something wrong with those guys *hrhrhr*
|
| |
09-25-2009, 05:51 AM
|
#35 (permalink)
| | Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 30
| Quote: |
Originally Posted by NYCAP123 My question though is: what were the plane and the helicopter doing on the flight deck in those conditions? | I guess it could be a salt spray corrosion test or water ingress test!!!!
anyway I would not like to be the next flight crew.
|
| |
09-30-2009, 11:31 PM
|
#36 (permalink)
| | Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: North Shore Long Island
Posts: 52
| Quote: |
Originally Posted by catmando Is it just me or does the third pic in the first batch look fake? | That was my thought as well.
|
| |
08-18-2010, 04:24 PM
|
#37 (permalink)
| | Publisher/Admin
Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: South Florida
Posts: 16,657
| |
| |
08-18-2010, 04:54 PM
|
#38 (permalink)
| | Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: SE Florida
Posts: 268
| Quote: |
Originally Posted by brunick | Those are big honking waves but they don't look like 90' to me.
|
| |
08-19-2010, 10:12 AM
|
#39 (permalink)
| | Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2010 Location: Boston
Posts: 49
|
I know it a little late but this is a description posted with the video on a Military Strategy web page.:
This carrier is 90,000 ton. Imagine what this is like on a 2,200 ton destroyer? The aircraft seen in the attached video is a helo from a deployed helicopter squadron (HS-14) based at the U.S. Naval Air Facility in Atsugi , Japan . The carrier is the USS Kitty Hawk, based in Yokosuka , Japan . The "Hawk" was underway for CQ (Airwing Carrier Qualifications) in the Sea of Japan during the week of March 22, 2008.
The chopper seen on the ship's bow, tied down at helo Spot 2, is a Sikorsky SH-60F from HS-14. The pilot had just landed on deck, and his helo was tied down on Spot 2 because the seas were too rough to move it to a safer place. Fortunately, it only suffered some minor damage (blade crutch support socket) and a lot of salt water intrusion from the sea...
While viewing the video and estimating the size of the waves, keep in mind that the carrier's flight deck is approximately 60' above the ship's normal water line.
|
| |
09-25-2012, 12:11 PM
|
#42 (permalink)
| | Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: Guernsey/Antigua
Posts: 1,700
| Aberdeen |
| | |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | | | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Rate This Thread | Linear Mode | |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | All times are EST. The time now is 09:32 PM. | |