| |  | Abramovich to build world's Largest Yacht? |  | | |
08-28-2005, 04:27 PM
|
#2 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Arlington Tx
Posts: 413
|
You have to admire a man who owns that many awesome yachts. I can't wait for Platinum to put to sea. |
| |
08-28-2005, 05:33 PM
|
#3 | | Publisher/Administrator
Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: South Florida
Posts: 9,857
|
I received an anonomous image of a proposed 560 foot gigayacht. Could this be the successor... |
| |
08-28-2005, 05:47 PM
|
#4 | | YF Wisdom Dept.
Join Date: May 2005 Location: Western Canada
Posts: 804
|
Good on Abramovich, if it is indeed his project. Raising the bar and challenging the builders makes it better for all of us.
|
| |
08-28-2005, 06:34 PM
|
#5 | | YF Moderator
Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: Sweden
Posts: 2,690
|
This green yacht, (looks like an Oeino design), seems to be much longer. Compare to the Pandora of 540´...? Maybe it is the "Evergreen" successor?
|
| |
08-29-2005, 12:59 AM
|
#6 | | Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2005 Location: Dordrecht
Posts: 470
| Quote: | Originally Posted by YachtForums I received an anonomous image of a proposed 560 foot gigayacht. Could this be the successor...  |
I don't know about this bigger thing;
I mean, Pelorus is an absolute beauty and as such it scores.
Platinum is just another nondescript ship with the added bonus that its the biggest of those; so?
If you've got the money every gorilla is able to have the biggest ship being build for him but this is hardly a bonus for the yachting community.
Personally, i hope that all this money will give us a new "Bannenberg" like designer, new technologies, something inspirational!
|
| |
08-29-2005, 01:04 AM
|
#7 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: Phoenix
Posts: 1,164
|
I agree with tantetruus. These proposed private cruise ships look like ..... cruise ships!
Kelly Cook
|
| |
08-29-2005, 02:18 AM
|
#8 | | YF Moderator
Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: Sweden
Posts: 2,690
|
I agree as well. Yachts bigger than Limitless are ships. We call them Gigayachts today, but Lady Moura, Mipos, Pelorus, Octopus, Rising Sun and Dubai are all too big to be considered yachts in my mind.
They might have superyacht finish and interiors, but as with houses, at some point it is not a villa but a castle. Too big for society to accept as reasonable.
If yacht buyers wanted to excel in design and refined taste I would be much happier than seeing those floating palaces. What R A is doing right, is that he is having several yachts, but bigger is certainly not better.
If you want a really big yacht, I think between 80 and 90 meters will be more than enough. If you want a really nice and still big yacht, I think 55 to 60 meters is ideal. If you just want a great superyacht, any size between 30 and 50 meter will fulfill your dreams.
The real challenge is to get a good, special and purposeful design, but especially today it seems as the buyers don´t care any longer. Semicustom boats of 45 to 55 meters is more pollution than progress seen from a designers point of view...
But before this thread is completely derailed, have a look at the thread on Designer Yachts where discussions on style and quality over size and quantity can continue... http://www.YachtForums.com/forums/showthread.php?t=3378
Last edited by AMG : 08-29-2005 at 03:27 AM.
|
| |
08-29-2005, 08:18 AM
|
#9 | | YF Moderator
Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Montreal, Qc, Canada
Posts: 1,368
|
Looks awesome to me! I say kudos to RA for raising the bar, pushing the envelope, upping the ante, or however you like to say it... if that really is his next project. I'm looking at this 2 ways: First... why? I mean, what can you put on a 560 footer that you can't put on a 400 footer? Better still, what do you need on a 560 footer that can't be put on a 400 footer? On the other hand... why not?  He's got the cash, and he obviously has a passion, so hey... go for it!
|
| |
08-29-2005, 09:37 AM
|
#10 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: Phoenix
Posts: 1,164
|
Just to be clear, it is not the sheer size I object to but rather that these designs have become so bland and predictable. If you can afford a private cruise ship, Ok. But why look pretty much like all the other cruise ships?
Kelly
|
| |
08-29-2005, 10:40 AM
|
#11 | | YF Moderator
Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: Sweden
Posts: 2,690
|
I remember to have seen something like this 560-footer before and digged into one of my notebooks from the early sixties, there it was!
(The text is: Luxury yacht owner...)
|
| |
08-29-2005, 10:52 AM
|
#12 | | YF Wisdom Dept.
Join Date: May 2005 Location: Western Canada
Posts: 804
| Quote: | Originally Posted by KCook Just to be clear, it is not the sheer size I object to but rather that these designs have become so bland and predictable. If you can afford a private cruise ship, Ok. But why look pretty much like all the other cruise ships?
Kelly |
Exactly!
I would think that it becomes progressively more difficult to design a vessel that doesn't look like a cruise ship as the size increases. This project could either turn out to be a wedding cake harbour queen of offensive proportions or something of beauty.
|
| |
08-29-2005, 12:25 PM
|
#13 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: Phoenix
Posts: 1,164
| Quote: | Originally Posted by Codger Exactly!
I would think that it becomes progressively more difficult to design a vessel that doesn't look like a cruise ship as the size increases. This project could either turn out to be a wedding cake harbour queen of offensive proportions or something of beauty. |
Oh, but quite the contrary. I would think that a larger design would give the designer MORE freedom to try new themes  . I agree that the bland wedding cakes must die. Just look at the largest expedition yachts. They show more novelty than these private cruise ships.
Feel free to jump in Lars
Kelly
|
| |
08-29-2005, 12:29 PM
|
#14 | | YF Moderator
Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Montreal, Qc, Canada
Posts: 1,368
|
Design elements to appear on RAs 560' giga: an indoor soccer field. |
| |
08-29-2005, 12:35 PM
|
#15 | | Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2005 Location: Dordrecht
Posts: 470
|
im glad that im not the only one who has his doubts on the "bigger" thing.
Lars said some sensible thing about sizes and their usability but my main objective is maybe not even size alone, but the lack of art and frankly, i dont understand that all this money should be unable to create something stunning, both in beauty and technology.
Most of the Bannenberg ships made me very happy, just looking at em (this sounds a bit weird, but still) and thats exactly the quality i hardly see anymore. |
| | |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | | | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Rate This Thread | Linear Mode | |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | All times are EST. The time now is 03:48 AM. | |