| |  | Flying Yacht |  | | |
04-29-2012, 05:32 AM
|
#1 (permalink)
| | Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: sweden
Posts: 25
| Flying Yacht
Hi
Found this on the web.
It sounds ambitious project.
I hope they get a buyer.
More here link |
| |
04-29-2012, 06:49 AM
|
#2 (permalink)
| | Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Ft. Lauderdale
Posts: 733
|
Wow what a concept, never heard about this before.
New designs and techonlogy are always welcome and needed, hope they get
lift-off. |
| |
04-29-2012, 07:10 AM
|
#3 (permalink)
| | YF Moderator
Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: Sweden
Posts: 4,715
|
Must be fun when the wind picks up..?
|
| |
04-29-2012, 07:14 AM
|
#4 (permalink)
| | Publisher/Admin
Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: South Florida
Posts: 16,658
|
Dirigible Dreaming? With a 300-foot ceiling, what happens when the wind blows?
|
| |
04-29-2012, 11:02 AM
|
#5 (permalink)
| | Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: Is Everything!
Posts: 1,320
|
Welcome to Hollywood, what's your dream?
|
| |
04-30-2012, 03:34 AM
|
#6 (permalink)
| | Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Fowey in Cornwall
Posts: 536
|
Basically a modified Zeppelin!
|
| |
04-30-2012, 07:07 AM
|
#7 (permalink)
| | Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2011 Location: Maine
Posts: 171
| Remnant of the cold war...
Back in the cold war, the Russians were very interested in WIG aircraft. They ended up getting the aviation equivalent of the IMO (basically the international powers that be in aviation) to accept that there would be 3 different classes of WIG aircraft. Class 1 is always in ground effect, class 2 up to 400' (bottom of controlled airspace in lots of places) and class 3 capable of true flight. The class 2 variants were meant to be able to run down a river, and if there was a bridge, hop over it. Class 3 is subject to full aircraft certification requirements, but (and this is the key part  ) class 2 is defined as a boat, not an aircraft. So the economics is quite different, less training, less inspections, etc.
So one can build an airplane, declare it a Class 2 WIG, and play under a unique set of rules. This is the first time I've seen it done with a lighter than air platform, it's an interesting concept. It will be interesting to see where this goes!
|
| |
05-02-2012, 11:30 AM
|
#8 (permalink)
| | Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: Chesapeake Bay, Delaware Bay & S.Jersey
Posts: 405
|
The picture on the first page of the link reminds me of something out of a Wallace and Gromit episode.......
|
| |
05-07-2012, 01:10 AM
|
#9 (permalink)
| | Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2012 Location: Tokyo
Posts: 85
| Quote:
Originally Posted by walkinginshadow Hi
Found this on the web.
It sounds ambitious project.
I hope they get a buyer.
More here link | Heh, back in the 90s I switched careers and studied aerospace engineering. One of the emphasis I mused with was with lighter than air designs because that was supposed to be the new industry for the 21st century; i.e. lighter than air luxury liners floating across North America. The only school at the time offering courses in dirigible design was San Jose State University. I came within a heartbeat of signing up, but begged off due to circumstances beyond my control.
Also, ironically enough, some history here, the US Navy had a couple of lighter than air "carriers" that sported biplanes. Both were based out of Ames airfield (now NASA Ames), about 15 to 20 minutes south from where I live (traffic depending). The hangars are still there, but the blimps are long since gone.
I think the Russians have a "hotel" in the works that's either a massive helo or a lighter than air design. Me, I think it's a novelty, more than anything else. People want to go to places, not putz around in the air. They want cruises via the water where they can dock and get out for a bit to stretch their legs, not float about. Just my opinion.
Still, it would be interesting to cruise in one for a couple of weeks. Just me |
| |
05-07-2012, 05:46 AM
|
#10 (permalink)
| | Guest |
I do not call that a yacht, for sure not. Neither we ever call a private Jet as Yacht. I think only in Star Wars they call Naboo Yacht Cruiser wonderful chromed airplane such. For me it is just a small Zeppelin, neither a Blimp, but can be. The Zeppelins had in the beginning other century Restaurant, lounges and Cabins inside, and for such they were called Airships. So, this is nothing new, maybe for a private. Then for me the denomination best which fits is Private Airship, or Private Zeppelin, because many Blimps were already Private from just one owner. The revived Friedrichshaven Zeppelin company in Constance Lake made some, but I think just one was sold to Japan, the others made some Shows or Small Passenger Tours then. It was expensive and not that successful, even with better technologies made. Then the Cargo Airlift near Brandenburg went bankrupcy and today is a big pool club inside for Tourists. so... don't think this will get a chance to survive further.
| |
| |
05-25-2012, 10:13 AM
|
#11 (permalink)
| | Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: Washington DC, Annapolis MD, Thailand
Posts: 2,042
| D-Dalus aircraft |
| |
07-09-2012, 06:59 PM
|
#13 (permalink)
| | Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2011 Location: Maine
Posts: 171
| Grumman Goose may go into production again! Quote:
Originally Posted by FISHTIGUA | This plane has always been a classic, and the fact there's serious focus on restarting production is great. I'd love to have a chance to experience one from the right seat! Antilles Seaplanes, The Official Website for the G-21G Super Goose |
| |
07-09-2012, 11:06 PM
|
#14 (permalink)
| | Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Ft. Lauderdale
Posts: 733
| Quote: |
This plane has always been a classic, and the fact there's serious focus on restarting production is great. I'd love to have a chance to experience one from the right seat!
| The Goose was popular for a while with the round engines and the rugged looks but had plenty problems and crashes over the years.
One of my co-workers died in a crash over in the Middle East attempting to ferry a turbo-goose back to the home country.
Once ya modify a WW2 airplane with turbine engines you may be sticking yer neck too far out.
Being an old DC-3 Captain I am all for keeping old birds alive and even producing them again, if it makes sense and if it is safe.
In this case it probably is not without extensice engineer and structural analysis. (To certify the old (new) design under a grand-father clauses does not count  )
|
| |
07-10-2012, 01:47 AM
|
#15 (permalink)
| | Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: Guernsey/Antigua
Posts: 1,704
| Quote:
Originally Posted by chuckb | Are these the seaplanes that used to 'land' at Charlotte Amalie harbour in the USVI? They came really close to the boats and cruiseships sometimes. My photos of them were mostly spray.
|
| | |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | | | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Rate This Thread | Linear Mode | |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | All times are EST. The time now is 08:22 AM. | |